Categories
General PR Media

Guy Clapperton on the death of normal media

guy-clapperton.jpg

Guy Clapperton is one of UK’s most prolific freelance business journalists. So I tend to pay attention to things he has to say (as do others – I gather over 300 people turned up on Wednesday to hear Guy along with Sally Whittle, Sally Morris, Chris Wheal, Lori Miles and Catherine Cooper at a Meet The Media event).

His recent post on the death of normal media raises some key points.

He refers to entrepreneur and former Dragon’s Den panellist Rachel Elnaugh’s blog , where she says she sees evidence that her blog rather than any press coverage has made an impact on public perceptions of her. And she suggests ‘normal’ press will get “a wake-up call.” (She also says that her foray into blogging goes against a lot traditional PR advice, which is to stay silent and adopt a ‘no comment’ status – I’d like to know who has been advising her).

As Guy says: “Many blogs are written by people who are inexperienced writers and who have no training. This can be a good thing because you see their thoughts as unpolished, which can be more raw and genuine – but the laws of libel apply in Cyberspace as much as they do elsewhere.”

He continues: “There’s a lot of dross out there in blogland but then there’s a lot of dross in journalism too; but has anyone told the bloggers how carefully they need to check their facts before publishing them? Journalists, by training, are inveterate checkers and goodness knows we make enough mistakes. Bloggers, without that background, are prone to repeating anything they hear.”

And finally: “After the initial blogging bubble has subsided you’ve got to ask what’s going to be left. If this is going to continue and people are going to get it right, they’ve got to find a way to make it viable to continue. This means making it pay. This is likely to mean advertising, and that in turn will mean guaranteeing editorial quality (advertisers won’t subsidise something that’s unreadable).”

As Guy concludes: “It’ll be almost like the traditional media all over again.”

Categories
General PR Technology PR Web/Tech

Publishers value ad sales more than editorial shocker

Valleywag fails to be outraged by Alex Petraglia, editor of Primotech, a US videogames-news site, claiming that CNET’s “ad sales team carries more weight than the editorial team.”

As Valleywag puts it: “Media companies don’t care about their writers. Reporters are nothing more than expendable, semi-skilled labor. Despite the chicken and the egg scenario (you can’t sell ads if there isn’t content, you can’t pay people to create content without ad sales), sales staff land the multimillion dollar deals that dictate everything from magazine cover themes to advertorial packages. You don’t need a bloody beheading to point out the disparity — just glance at the parking lot. All those Infiniti G37s belong to sales. Editorial is lucky to be cruising about in a used Ford Focus.”

On one level, they are right – editorial has never been as well paid as the sales side of publishing – however, there does seem to be a paradox in that everyone seems to agree that quality content is a key differentiator (both in publishing and PR) – yet no one seems to want to pay for it.

Categories
General PR

Strumpette editor Amanda Chapel resigns

Not a headline I expected to be writing today – but apparently, Strumpete Editor Amanda Chapel has had enough.

Say what you will about Ms Chapel (and many have), there can be no doubt she brought a much needed level of focus and debate to the PR industry generally. We’ll certainly miss her at Object Towers.

Categories
General PR

Top UK PR agencies caught editing client entries on Wikipedia

Front page piece from today’s PR Week which claims that: "PR agencies are flouting Wikipedia rules demanding they do not edit the site. At least six of the PRWeek top ten UK agencies have edited the site in the past year, according to WikiScanner, a new programme that tracks the IP addresses of computers editing the online encyclopaedia.

FD is the biggest offender, filing 25 edits, primarily concerning clients Russ DeLeon and Ruth Parasol – founders of the online gambling company PartyGaming."

I’ve always thought the blanket ban on PR agencies editing a bit draconian – surely there would be no issue for PR companies to do this providing it was done transparently ie their interest was declared and they could back up the rationale for the suggested changes.

Then again, its Wikipedia’s show – so if PR agencies knowingly flout its rules – and get caught – only themselves to blame.

Still – not just PR agencies doing this kind of thing – as this piece  shows, everyone from the BBC, the CIA and the office of the Australian Prime Minister are at it…..still, kudos to the BBC for running such a story and helpfully including a link to the Wikipedia Scanner.

Categories
General PR

90pc of PRs say online coverage has become more important in the last 12 months

Says a new survey from Webitpr.

But more important than what? Print media?

As we’ve said before, some semblance of balance needs to be maintained on the online vs offline press coverage debate.

Categories
General PR

Google invites the people featured in news stories to comment | Technology | Guardian Unlimited

Google invites the people featured in news stories to comment | Technology | Guardian Unlimited.

Blimey – really curious to know how Google are going to make this work…..

Categories
General PR

Getting it in the neck

Maybe it’s because we are in the summer silly season, but a few people seem to be getting it the neck from the bloggerati over the last few days – here are the main targets:

Sir Elton John – says we should close down the Internet for five years.

Rory Sutherland, Executive Creative Director at Ogilvy – for contributing a "state the bleedin’ obvious" puff piece to Precision Marketing.

ITPR, a tech PR agency – their "A Day In The Life" of an account exec piece appears to have unleashed a torrent of amusement and disbelief at TWL.

Happy days.

Categories
General PR

The Economist Style Guide – online

I’ve always had a copy of The Economist Style Guide close to hand –  of course, I can’t swear I’ve always abided by its rules – but it has been a valuable aid when people question why you’ve written something in a particular way.

I should therefore have guessed it would be online – and sure enough, it is (albeit a condensed version). I commend it to all right thinking PR and marketing people. The following section on use of jargon is particularly helpful:

Avoid it. You may have to think harder if you are not to use jargon, but you can still be precise. Technical terms should be used in their proper context; do not use them out of it. In many instances simple words can do the job of exponential (try fast), interface (frontier or border) and so on. If you find yourself tempted to write about affirmative action or corporate governance, you will have to explain what it is; with luck, you will then not have to use the actual expression.

Avoid, above all, the kind of jargon that tries either to dignify nonsense with seriousness (The appointee…should have a proven track record of operating at a senior level within a multi-site international business,  preferably within a service- or brand-oriented environment, declared an advertisement for a financial controller for The Economist Group) or to obscure the truth (We shall not launch the ground offensive until we have attrited the Republican Guard to the point when they no longer have  an effective offensive capacity   — the Pentagon’s way of saying that the allies would not fight on the ground until they had killed so many Iraqis that the    others would not attack).

What was meant by the Israeli defence ministry when it issued the following press release remains    unclear: The United States and Israel now possess the capability to conduct real-time simulations with man in the loop for full-scale  theatre missile defence architectures for the Middle East.

Try not to use foreign words and phrases unless there is no English alternative, which is unusual (so a year or per year, not per annum; a person or per person, not per capita; beyond one’s authority, not ultra vires; and so on).

 

Categories
General PR

Has the ad biz lost its lustre? Management Today

Images
Good piece by Alex Benady about the current state of the advertising industry in the latest issue of Management Today. The following excerpt makes for sobering reading – and not just for ad execs. It also doesn’t include any reference to Internet channels either:

In 1980 there was just one commercial TV channel.

By 1997
there were 58 pay-TV channels, 172 radio stations and 7,088 periodicals.

By late 2003 there were 296 pay-TV channels, 263 radio stations (and a
further 43 digital multiplexes with nine channels each) and 8,338
periodicals.

Today, 797 TV channels are licensed to broadcast, making it
harder and more expensive to reach consumers. And with fragmenting
audiences, advertising is losing much of the cultural currency that
comes from critical mass.

Perhaps the most ignominious sign of the adman’s descent in the
corporate pecking order is the fact that, increasingly, it’s the
procurement rather than the marketing department’s job to buy
advertising. The intrusion of purchasing professionals into advertising
contracts drives many in the agency world to distraction.

These people
know the price of everything and the value of nothing,’ fulminates a Top
30 agency chief. ‘How on earth can you value imponderables like a great
film script when you are talking to someone who was buying bog rolls by
the yard just an hour ago?’

Categories
General PR

Journalist uses Facebook for editorial contribution shocker

Even if Saul Hansell isn’t going to use Facebook for PR purposes, some journalists clearly already are. Marc Brenner, Editor of The Research Magazine, has  been requesting editorial contributions via the title’s Facebook forum members. He refers to "a good slab of response" to this already – a possible pointer as to how Facebook can be made to work for both journalist and PR.